(average annual)
|
1995 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Thousand persons |
||||||||||||
Total economically active population |
4 524.2 |
4 539.6 |
4 523.9 |
4 506.4 |
4 487.6 |
4 437.6 |
4 490.6 |
4 534.4 |
4 566.9 |
4 654.2 |
4 686.1 |
4 742.2 |
men |
2 147.5 |
2 152.7 |
2 129.0 |
2 106.9 |
2 089.7 |
2 071.5 |
2 119.7 |
2 148.1 |
2 169.1 |
2 197.9 |
2 222.5 |
2 289.4 |
women |
2 376.7 |
2 386.9 |
2 394.9 |
2 399.5 |
2 397.9 |
2 366.1 |
2 370.9 |
2 386.3 |
2 397.8 |
2 456.3 |
2 463.6 |
2 452.8 |
Out of total economically active population, employed population – total1) |
4 409.6 |
4 443.6 |
4 421.8 |
4 386.9 |
4 346.9 |
4 325.7 |
4 414.1 |
4 470.2 |
4 518.3 |
4 610.5 |
4 643.9 |
4 703.0 |
men |
2 105.7 |
2 115.1 |
2 087.2 |
2 060.0 |
2 037.6 |
2 033.6 |
2 095.1 |
2 126.5 |
2 151.7 |
2 181.9 |
2 204.1 |
2 271.0 |
women |
2 303.9 |
2 328.5 |
2 334.6 |
2 326.9 |
2 309.3 |
2 292.1 |
2 319.0 |
2 343.7 |
2 366.6 |
2 428.6 |
2 439.8 |
2 432.0 |
As percent of economically active population |
||||||||||||
Total economically active population |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
men |
47.5 |
47.4 |
47.1 |
46.8 |
46.6 |
46.7 |
47.2 |
47.4 |
47.5 |
47.2 |
47.4 |
48.3 |
women |
52.5 |
52.6 |
52.9 |
53.2 |
53.4 |
53.3 |
52.8 |
52.6 |
52.5 |
52.8 |
52.6 |
51.7 |
Out of total economically active population, employed population – total1) |
97.5 |
97.9 |
97.8 |
97.3 |
96.9 |
97.5 |
98.3 |
98.6 |
98.9 |
99.1 |
99.1 |
99.2 |
men |
46.6 |
46.6 |
46.2 |
45.7 |
45.4 |
45.8 |
46.7 |
46.9 |
47.1 |
46.9 |
47.0 |
47.9 |
women |
50.9 |
51.3 |
51.6 |
51.6 |
51.5 |
51.7 |
51.6 |
51.7 |
51.8 |
52.2 |
52.1 |
51.3 |
For reference: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level of economical |
79.8 |
78.0 |
77.2 |
76.5 |
75.9 |
74.8 |
75.6 |
76.4 |
77.1 |
78.9 |
79.9 |
81.4 |
Continuation of spreadsheet
(average annual)
|
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
Thousand persons |
|||||
Total economically active population |
4 722.7 |
4 640.6 |
4 601.8 |
4 572.8 |
4 537.3 |
men |
2 330.7 |
2 274.3 |
2 270.0 |
2 305.7 |
2 288.1 |
women |
2 392.0 |
2 366.3 |
2 331.8 |
2 267.1 |
2 249.2 |
Out of total economically active population, employed population – total1) |
4 691.2 |
4 612.1 |
4 578.4 |
4 550.5 |
4 496.0 |
men |
2 315.6 |
2 260.0 |
2 256.6 |
2 292.0 |
2 261.0 |
women |
2 375.6 |
2 352.1 |
2 321.8 |
2 258.5 |
2 235.0 |
As percent of economically active population |
|||||
Total economically active population |
100 |
100 |
|
100 |
100 |
men |
49.3 |
49.0 |
49.3 |
50.4 |
50.4 |
women |
50.7 |
51.0 |
50.7 |
49.6 |
49.6 |
Out of total economically active population, employed population – total1) |
99.3 |
99.4 |
|
99.5 |
99.1 |
men |
49.0 |
48.7 |
49.0 |
50.1 |
49.8 |
women |
50.3 |
50.7 |
50.5 |
49.4 |
49.3 |
For reference: |
|
|
|
|
|
Level of economical |
81.8 |
81.2 |
81.4 |
81.8 |
82.1 |
____________________
1) Since 2010 the number of employed population is recalculated in accordance with the Methodology for the compilation and calculation of labour resources balance sheet (as amended by the Resolution of the National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus of April 13, 2015 No18).
© National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. When using information reference to the National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus is mandatory.